|
FMRIG
offers an exciting research participation opportunity: Families needed for
study of sibling relationships
in separated families. Your
participation would involve two sessions, each lasting between 60 and 90
minutes. Your child’s participation would involve Research
sessions can be conducted at the For more
information about this study, or to volunteer for this study, If you wish
to talk to my supervisor, Dr. Marion Ehrenberg, she can be contacted by phone
or e-mail at: FMRIG contributes a chapter to a new, cutting-edge
book about sibling relationships. FMRIG Presents at CPA - June 2009 FMRIG members travelled to Montreal to share some of the interesting
results of a long-term study of young adults who experienced parental divorce
in the last conference of the Canadian Psychological Association. The following
is a summary of the two posters presented: FMRIG Presents at CPA: Self-Reflections of Young
Adults Who Experienced Parental Divorce:
How Are Views of Marriage and Divorce Affected? For this study, which used an attachment theory framework and integrated
quantitative and qualitative methods, 270 young adults with divorced parents
were interviewed. Participants were
asked about their outlook on marriage and divorce, as well as invited to offer
their perceptions of how early family experiences had influenced those
perspectives. Our results showed that individuals
whose parents’ divorces were high in conflict held more cautious/hesitant views
of marriage; they have shared feelings such as: “It’s scary and overwhelming.
I’m not ready for it.” At the same time, these individuals focused more on such
key elements of successful marriages as commitment, than did participants whose
parents’ divorces were cooperative. Interestingly, level of conflict did not influence overall perceptions
of divorce. Concerning their views on how parental divorce influenced
perceptions of close relationships, young adults (especially women) with
insecure attachment styles perceived a negative influence in the form of “trust
issues,” including fears that their partner will cheat on them, whereas
securely attached young adults (especially men) viewed their parents’ divorce
to have had positive effects on their close relationships. Similarly, securely attached
young adults reported feelings of “acceptance that ending a marriage is ok,”
whereas insecure participants offered a more skeptical view of marriage.
Overall, young men with divorced parents held more pragmatic, non-idealized
views of marriage and divorce than did young women. FMRIG Presents at CPA: Young Men’s & Women’s
Opinions of Marriage & Divorce in the Context of Family of Origin
Experience This study investigated the perspectives on marriage and
divorce of 537 young adults
raised in intact and divorced families.
Individuals with insecure attachment styles
were found to hold less favorable and more cynical and pessimistic views of marriage than young adults with secure
attachment styles, especially if they had also experienced
their parents’ divorce. Secure and insecure young adults’ views on marriage did not
differ in their opinions of what are
the key elements of a successful marriage and their belief that the timing of marriage is critical. Overall, those who
had experienced their parents’ divorce during
childhood tended to hold more cautious/hesitant views of marriage than those with married parents. Concerning views of divorce, secure and
insecure individuals shared a
negative view of divorce and reflected that divorce risk may be heightened by poor preparation for marriage. Having
experienced parental divorce tended to strengthen
these negative views of divorce. Secure young adults tended to view divorce as a necessary outcome for poor
marriages more so than did those with insecure
attachments. Family Boundary Diffusion, Individuation, and
Adjustment among Young Adults: An Investigation of Gender and Family Structure
Effects This study, drawing on the experiences of 400 young adults,
investigates how reports of family
boundary diffusion in adolescence are linked to psychological individuation from parents and adjustment
in young adulthood. It is expected that young
adults who experienced family boundary diffusions (measured by triangulation and parentification) in adolescence may
experience more negative emotions toward their
parents (e.g., guilt, anger) and may have a more difficult time with navigating the normal and healthy individuation
process typically occurring in this developmental
period. This, in turn, is hypothesized to be related to negative adjustment, measured by indices of
overall- and relational adjustment. Further, the study also explores how the associations of these relationships
may be similar or different for
young men and women with divorced and married parents. Does Attachment Style Mediate the Link between
Parental Differential Treatment and Young Adults' Well-Being and Interpersonal
Relationship Quality? The first goal of Laura's Ph.D. dissertation study is to
explore the influence of parental
differential treatment (PDT) on sibling relationship quality, romantic relationship quality, and adjustment in young
adulthood. The study investigates whether
attachment style mediates the relations between PDT and these outcomes, potentially serving as a mechanism through
which PDT exerts its influence. This study is the first to explore PDT’s
influence on all of these outcomes in one sample, as well as to take into consideration the context of the overall
quality of the parent-child
relationship and young adults’ perceptions of the fairness of their parents’
PDT. The
second goal of this study is to develop a new, more thorough self-report measure of young adults’ perceptions of PDT
in their current relationships with their parents. This measure aims to assess young adults’
views of the differential relationships
that they and their siblings have with their parents, rather than the views of children, adolescents, or
parents. Therefore, it examines domains
of PDT that should be particularly
salient to parent-child relationships in young adulthood (e.g., positive affective quality,
negative affective quality, parental support, fostering independence, and negative control). This new measure of PDT will be compared with the Sibling Inventory of Differential
Experience (SIDE; Daniels & Plomin, 1985), the
most well-known and best empirically validated self-report measure of PDT. Summary of research results: The Families in
Motion Research and Information Group (FMRIG) at the University of Victoria
recently completed an online survey of remarried parents regarding their
remarital quality, coparenting relations with their former spouses, and their
beliefs about each of these relationships. As part of her doctoral
dissertation and under the supervision of Associate Professor Dr. Marion
Ehrenberg, clinical psychology student Jennifer Pringle was interested to learn
more about marital satisfaction and commitment in remarriage, particularly some
of the experiences of remarried parents who continue to share parenting
responsibilities with their former spouses. The study explored two possible influences on remarital quality: 1) a
remarried parent’s relationship with his/her former spouse, and 2) expectations
and beliefs about remarriage and about shared parenting with former
spouses. Some previous research has found that although having a strong,
positive relationship with one’s former spouse is beneficial to children after
their parents’ divorce, it can be an added strain in a remarriage and can cause
tension with one’s new spouse, sometimes referred to as a “spillover” of
conflict. On the other hand, some remarried spouses have described that a
positive relationship with their former spouses relieves stress in their
remarriage because there are several adults involved in caring for children and
fewer disagreements about parenting responsibilities. One possible explanation for these differing reactions involves one’s
expectations and beliefs about remarriage, stepfamilies, and coparenting with
former spouses. Although there are now over half a million stepfamilies
in Canada, there are still many misconceptions that can make it challenging to
know what to expect when remarrying and bringing multiple households
together. Individuals may have differing beliefs before remarriage about
what kind of relationship they will have with their former spouses, how
involved their new spouses will be in childrearing, and how their stepfamilies
will operate, for example. While many people find that it can take
several months or years for stepfamily members to adjust to one another’s preferences,
in the meantime unmet expectations can lead to disappointment or
conflict. As such, it is important for research to better understand some
of the beliefs and expectations that remarried individuals hold regarding their
new marriages and stepfamilies. Enlarging our understanding of
these dynamics to the benefit of remarried parents and families was the focus
of our Remarriage & Coparenting Study. Over 140 remarried parents from across Canada, the United States, and
some other nations responded to the online survey. Related to the two
main ideas presented above, Jennifer’s results suggested that: 1) The relationship with the former spouse was not
related to one’s remarital satisfaction and commitment for most partners.
Although some researchers have found a “spillover” effect where conflict in the
coparenting relationship co-occurs with conflict in the remarital relationship,
participants in Jennifer’s study seemed not to experience significant
disruption in their remarriages from coparenting conflicts or challenges.
In fact, most respondents reported current satisfaction with their remarriages
and with the way they communicated with their former spouses about coparenting
matters. 2) Of the various beliefs that respondents were asked about,
two very important ones were an expectation that stepfamilies only have a slim
chance of success, and a belief that stepfamilies are “second-best” compared to
biologically-related nuclear families. Understandably, these thoughts
could create a lot of discouragement about one’s own remarriage and
stepfamily. On a very encouraging note, however, individuals who held
these beliefs before remarriage typically found that their thoughts changed
over time and they felt more optimistic in later years. Perhaps the
actual experiences of living in a remarriage and stepfamily reassured these
individuals of how fulfilling their new relationships were after all, and
fostered an appreciation of the unique benefits of their new families.
Furthermore, the people who recalled the greatest decreases in these beliefs
over time also reported more positive remarital adjustment at present, compared
to people whose beliefs did not change as much. The sooner that these
beliefs changed, the greater the benefits were to one’s adjustment. These results suggest that beliefs and expectations about remarriage and
stepfamily life can be very relevant in how well one adjusts to these
transitions. Thus, it is important that remarrying couples and their
children have opportunities to develop positive beliefs and expectations about
stepfamilies. The media can play an important role, by showing a broader
range of successful and well-adjusted stepfamilies on television, in movies, in
books and magazines. Communicating with experienced stepfamilies via
support groups, online communities, and social networks is also an excellent
way to expand a positive view of remarriage and stepfamilies. Family
counsellors can help by encouraging remarrying couples and their children to
examine their own beliefs about the stepfamily they are forming together and to
consider ways of problem-solving worries or concerns they might have about the
transition. Jennifer Pringle and Dr. Marion Ehrenberg wish to thank all parents who participated in this survey, as well as the many community agencies who promoted the project. We are very appreciative of your time and interest in this research, and for allowing us to learn from your experiences and perceptions. Please stay tuned to our website http://www.uvic.ca/psyc/fmrig for further details about the survey results and about other upcoming projects that are relevant to families in transition. Our group is committed to communicating our research findings to participants, to social scientists, to practitioners and to policy-makers in ways that will be helpful to individuals and families. Our website also lists several books, websites, and other information about divorce, co-parenting, and stepfamilies.
|
| 24 March 10 |