Although it is subject to change, below is the course outline as of Meeting 1. Please note that the prompts for each assignment are (or will be) provided on the index page of the course website.
January 5th (Meeting 1)
No Required Readings
No Lecture or Workshop
Seminar Discussion: What do you expect (or need) from this seminar? What do you want to do?
January 12th (Meeting 2) – Course Overview
Required Reading: (1) Turkel, â€œHow-To,â€ and (2) Sayers and Dietrich, â€œAuthoring and Publishing with Scalar: Some Considerations for Context-Sensitive Designâ€ (distributed by email)
Optional Reading: (1) Kirschenbaum, â€œWhat is Digital Humanities and What Is It Doing in English Departments?â€, (2) Bogost, â€œGetting Real,â€ (3) McPherson, â€œMedia Studies and the Digital Humanities,â€ (4) Rommel, â€œLiterary Studies,â€ and (5) W3C (CSS, RDF, and HTML, in particular)
Log Due: Workflow (text only, 500-1000 words)
Workshop: The Anatomy of the Scalar Platform and How to Use It
Lecture: â€œWhatâ€™s Wrong with Digital Humanities?â€
Seminar Discussion: What questions do you have about Scalar? What didnâ€™t we cover that you think it can or should do?
January 19th (Meeting 3) – Modeling & Metadata
Optional Reading: (1) Besser, â€œThe Past, Present, and Future of Digital Libraries,â€ (2) Drucker, SpecLab, (3) the Text Encoding Initiative, (4) Meloni, “Working with APIs,”Â (also: Part 2,Â 3, & 4), (5) Brown, et al., â€œGoing Electronic,” (6) Galey and Reucker, â€œHow a Prototype Argues,â€ and (7) McGann, “Texts in N-Dimensions and Interpretation in a New Key”
Log Due: Workflow in Action (screencast with vocal track, or 500-1000 words with screenshots)
Workshop: Modeling Collaboration and Inquiry in Scalar: Paths, Dublin Core, and the Resource Description Framework
Lecture: â€œToward a Speculative Humanitiesâ€
Seminar Discussion: What to consider when authoring in collaborative, networked environments?
January 26th (Meeting 4) – The Materiality of Electronic Writing
Required Reading: (1) Kirschenbaum et al., â€œDigital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments,â€ (2) Hayles, â€œElectronic Literature: What Is It?â€, and (3) Wendy Chun, â€œThe Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memoryâ€
Optional Reading: (1) Kirschenbaum, Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination, (2) Wendy Chun, Programmed Visions: Software and Memory, (3) Hayles, Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary, (4) Willett, â€œElectronic Texts: Audiences and Purposes,â€Â (5) Open3DP, (6) Loftus, “The Author’s Desktop,”Â and (7)Â Sayers, â€œEvery Click Leaves a Trace: Literature in an Age of Attention Accumulation” (distributed by email)
Log Due: Metadata (screencast with vocal track, or 500-1000 words with screenshots)
Lecture 1: â€œThree Histories of Writing Today: Digital? Electronic? Or the Interface?â€
Lecture 2: â€œWhat to Do with Uncle Buddy?â€
Seminar Discussion: In the case of electronic writing, what are the differences between storage, memory, and inscription? Why should we care?
February 2nd (Meeting 5) – Distant Reading and NeoGeo
Optional Reading: (1) Moretti, Graphs, Maps, Trees, (2) Moretti, â€œNetwork Theory, Plot Analysis,â€ (3) Moretti, Atlas of the European Novel 1800-1900, (4) Guldi, “The Spatial Turn in Literature,”Â and (5) Scholars’ Lab, “Spatial Humanities: Step by Step,”
Workshop: Google Earth and Maps: A Model of or a Model for?
Lecture: â€œClose, Distant, and a Combinationâ€
Seminar Discussion: What does distant reading imply about scholarly labor? How do we read with computers? To what effects?
February 9th (Meeting 6) – Data Visualization
Reading Due: (1) Jessop, â€œDigital Visualization as a Scholarly Activity,â€Â (2) Drucker, â€œHumanities Approaches to Graphical Display,â€ (3) Ramsay, “Algorithmic Criticism,” and (4)Â The Brown University Women Writers Project
Optional Reading: (1) D3: Data-Driven Documents, (2) TimeFlow: Analytical Timeline, (3) Many Eyes, (4) Manovich, â€œCultural Analytics,â€ (5) Google Refine, (6) Mr. Data Converter, (7) Pajek, (8) McGhee, “Getting Started with Data Visualization,” (9) Junar, and (10)Â SIMILE.
Log Due: Map (embedded in Scalar, with a 250-word description)
Workshop: Experimenting with TAPoR
Lecture: â€œDo We Need â€˜Dataâ€™ in Digital Literary Studies?â€
Seminar Discussion 1: What should be the key components of visual literacy in digital literary studies?
Seminar Discussion 2: Howâ€™s the project going? What project are you reviewing? Share thoughts and progress.
* Note: You should have met with me during office hours or by appointment at least once by now.
February 16th (Reading Break)
February 23rd (Meeting 7) – Communicating Your Work
Optional Reading: Pecha Kucha 20×20
Log Due: Text Analysis (linked from or embedded in Scalar, with 250-word description)
Workshop 1: Drafting a Project Proposal and Needs Assessment
Workshop 2: How to Conduct Pecha Kucha Presentations
Lecture: â€œCommon Elements of a Digital Humanities Projectâ€
Seminar Discussion: Related to the production of a proof of concept, what are your concerns? What should we do on March 8th?
March 1st (Meeting 8) – Humanities Interaction and Interface Design
Optional Reading: (1) Drucker, â€œHumanities Approaches to Interface Theory,â€ (2) Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, (3) Daniel, â€œThe Database: An Aesthetics of Dignity,â€ (4) Daniel, â€œHybrid Practices,â€ (5) Kaplan, Precision Targets, and (6) Young-Hae Chang Heavy Industries
Log Due: Review (750 âˆ’ 1000 words, selected project needs to be approved before evaluation is submitted)
Lecture: â€œLiterature as Context Productionâ€
Seminar Discussion: What should a â€œliteraryâ€ interface do? How (if at all) should it differ from our more familiar (e.g., commercial) interfaces?
March 8th (Meeting 9) – Wild Card
Reading, Lecture, Workshop, and Seminar Discussion collectively determined by graduate students on February 23rd.
No Log Due
March 15th (Meeting 10) – Peer Review
Required Reading: (1) Fitzpatrick, â€œPeer Reviewâ€ (from draft version of Planned Obsolescence), (2) Nowviskie, â€œWhy, Oh Why, CC-BYâ€ and “Where Credit Is Due,”Â and (3) MLA, “The Evaluation of Digital Work”
Optional Reading: CHNM, PressForward
Project Proposal Due (published in Scalar with links / embedded media as necessary)
Workshop: Peer Review of Proposals and Draft Materials
Seminar Discussion: Pecha Kucha Presentations
* Note: You should have met with me during office hours or by appointment at least twice by now.
March 22nd (Meeting 11) – Computational Culture Studies
Required Reading: (1) McPherson, â€œWhy Are the Digital Humanities So White?, or, Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation,â€Â (2) Ang and Pothen, “Between Promise and Practice: Web 2.0, Intercultural Dialogue and Digital Scholarship,”Â and (3) Liu, â€œWhere Is Cultural Criticism in Digital Humanities?â€
Optional Reading: (1) Latour, Science in Action, (2) Bowker and Star, Sorting Things Out, (3) Fuller, Software Studies: A Lexicon, (4) Nakamura, Digitizing Race, (5) Computational Culture 1.1, and (8) Bogost, â€œWhat Is Object-Oriented Ontology?â€
No Log Due
Lecture: â€œCombining Theory with Practice in Digital Literary Studiesâ€
Seminar Discussion: What are some challenges to combining theory and practice? What is the practice of culture in a digital age?
March 29th (Meeting 12) – The Future of the Book
Required Reading: (1) Sterling, â€œEighteen Challenges in Contemporary Literature,â€Â and (2) Phillips, A Humument
Optional Reading: (1) Jackson, Skin, (2) Danielewski, House of Leaves, (3) Danielewski, Only Revolutions, (4) Loyer, Strange Rain, (5) kindle.amazon.com, (6) Bogost, “Persuasive Games: Exploitationware,”Â (7) Barry, “Nuts and Bolts,”Â and (8) Institute of Network Cultures, The Unbound Book
Log Due: Assessment (500-1000 words, with duplicated content from peers’ logs)
Workshop: Releasing a Scalar Project into the Wild: Writing with the Cloud Crowd
Lecture: â€œThe Book Unboundâ€
Seminar Discussion: Off You Go with a Manifesto (Inspired by Shannon Mattern)
April 5th (Meeting 13) – Final Presentations
Three Panels, 30 minutes (minimum) + 15 minutes Q&A each
April 19th – Final Project Due
[Image source: Screenshot of the Electronic Literature Collection, Volume 2]