History 240

The English Revolution

 

Objectives

•             Why did English politics degenerate to the point where the King was at war with his own Parliament?

•             If he was a bad king, why did so many continue to support him?

•             Why did the English republic fail to last?

•             What were the longer-term consequences of the English Civil War and Interregnum.

 

Degeneration of English Politics

•             Serious religious divisions.

•             Breakdown of financial and political system in face of inflation and rising costs of war.

•             The Problems of one King with multiple kingdoms.

 

Serious Religious Divisions.

•      Religious turmoil 1533-58.

•      By the end of the century, Catholics and Puritans increase attacks on Elizabethan Church.

•      Catholics executed; Puritans hounded out to Holland and America.

•      Catholics discredited and decreasing in number under James I (1603-1625).

•      Puritans continue anti-Catholic hysteria and extend it to moderate Protestants.

 

The Church under Charles I (1600-1649)

•       Increasing division between Puritans and moderate Anglicans.

•       Charles married a French Catholic,  Henrietta Maria – opposed by Puritans.

•       Puritans alienate Anglicans: Anglicans support  the King, against the attacks of Puritans.

•       Fear that religion would again become a life-or-death issue.

 

The Church under Charles I (1600-1649)

•       Charles appoints Archbishop of Canterbury; a moderate Anglican who favoured some Catholic practices.

•       Puritans: Catholic Queen and crypto-Catholic Archbishop evidence that Charles wanted to undermine the English Church and re-establish Catholicism.

 

Breakdown of Financial and Political System

•      King expected to rely on own financial resources during peace: rents, fees, customs.

•      Dramatic price inflation: 1510-1597 585%.

•      Military changes make war more expensive.

•      James I and Charles I wanted to compete with other European monarchs militarily and culturally.

•      James I doubled Elizabeth’s annual expenditure.

•      Royal income did not keep pace with expenditure.

•      James I and Charles I could barely afford peace time expenditure; wartime caused financial crisis.

 

Parliament and Taxation

•      English Parliament had power to control taxation, unlike France and Spain.

•      Parliament granted increases and could not understand why it was not enough.

•      Distrust between King and Parliament.

•      Parliament believed Charles was wasting money.

•      Collection of taxes caused public hostility.

•      Charles hated Parliament and ruled without it 1629-1639.

•      Charles had to resort to unpopular sources of revenue: distrait of knighthood, ship money.

 

Political Crisis

•      MPs believe Charles was subverting Parliament and establishing a dictatorship.

•      Charles thought Parliament was trying to exceed its jurisdiction.

•      Parliament believed it was defending the constitution against Charles’s attempts to subvert it.

•      Charles believed he was defending the constitution against Parliament’s attempts to subvert it.

 

The Problem of Multiple Kingdoms

•      James and Charles were kings of Scotland and England, but they were administered separately.

•      Scotland had a different religious settlement: more Calvinist and Presbyterian.

•      Scotland had a different system of law and education.

•      James and Charles were also kings of Ireland.

•      Irish religious situation was complex: majority of Irish and original English nobility were Catholic. Only later English emigrants were Anglican. There were also Scottish Presbyterians.

 

The Problem of Multiple Kingdoms

•      English pretended their king was monarch of a single state called England. They tried to force their kings to do things that as kings of Scotland, they could not do.

•      Charles I of England, like Charles V HRE, could not be one religion in one kingdom and another in another.

 

The First Great Crisis

•      1637 Charles I and Laud tried to change Scottish Church to make it more like the English.

•      This caused a great rebellion.

•      Charles sent a English army to fight the Scots in 1639 but ran out of money and was defeated.

•      Charles called the Short Parliament to get more money but MPs demanded that he address their grievances first, but he refused.

•      In 1640, the Scots invaded England and defeated the English Army again.

 

The Long Parliament

•      Charles needed money to pay the Scottish army.

•      Parliament was distrustful of him and opposed him.

•      Un-parliamentary taxation was abolished; new law requiring triennial Parliaments and king could not dissolve it without its consent.

•      Parliament tried to wrest control of the Army away from Charles.

•      Charles failed to arrest 5 Parliamentary leaders.

•      Charles moved to Oxford and England split into two camps.

 

England Divided

•      Charles had the support of the majority of the nobility and their dependents.

•      People joined the King because they believed that parliament was undermining the King and usurping his powers.

•      No matter how bad a ruler he was, opposing a king was contrary to the will of God.

•      Parliament had no long-term plan.

•      Parliament had the support of London, the commercial and financial interests, radical politicians and some of the nobility.

 

England Divided

•      People fought for Parliament because they believed the King was trying to establish a dictatorship.

•      Regionally, London and SE supported Parliament; N and W supported Charles.

•      The key issue was religion: Puritans and Calvinists supported Parliament; Catholics and moderate Anglicans the King.

 

First Civil War 1642

•      King was a poor military leader.

•      Parliament used financial and administrative advantages of London and the navy.

•      Charles’s support was in the countryside, but people would not fight outside their own county.

•      Parliament created the New Model Army, better trained, organized and commanded and made independent of Parliamentary control.

•      The Scottish Army supported Parliament.

 

Second Civil War 1647.

•      Parliament won but did not know what to do next.

•      Charles negotiated with Scots, Parliament and the Army but agreed to nothing.

•      Parliament began to fear the New Model Army – more Puritan and radical.

•      Parliament refused to pay the army.

•      Charles escaped and allied with the Scots.

 

The Army Takes Control

•      The Army under Oliver Cromwell defeated and captured Charles in 1648.

•      Determined to execute him, the Army purged Parliament of all but most radical.

•      Charles tried and executed in 1649.

 

New Constitutional Problem: How to govern without a King.

•      A military dictatorship without stable leadership.

•      Several Parliamentary experiments failed. The military dictatorship was worse than Charles I.

•      Cromwell was one of the few that people trusted declared Lord Protector in 1651.

•      How to reconcile popular consent with God’s Providence and how to elect a Parliament that would not overthrow all that he stood for.

•      The regime could only survive as Cromwell.

•      Stability could only be achieved with a restoration of the monarchy.

 

1660: The Restoration of
Charles II (1630-1685)

•       General amnesty; liberty of conscience.

•       Parliament made land settlement and paid the arrears to the army.

•       Parliamentary system and Church of England restored as before the war.

•       Powers obtained by Long Parliament retained – King cannot rule without Parliament.

 

Results of the Civil War, Interregnum and Restoration

•             King could not rule without Parliament or visa versa.

•             The King and Parliament had to devise a stable system of government finance.

•             English would not endure economic, political or social costs of a standing army.

•             Religious settlement had to be broad enough for diversity of Anglican faith with safeguards to prevent Catholicisation.

 

England compared to Europe

•             England had the revolution but both experienced wars that had important religious contexts.

•             Issues regarding raising of revenue to meet costs of war common to both.

•             Privileged regions and groups contribute more to Crown finances and feared loss of ancient rights and liberties from advancing power of state.

•             Monarchs trying to change the existing system. Not a revolutionary society and a conservative regime, but a conservative society and a revolutionary regime.

 

Back to History 240 Y03 Home