History 240
The
English Revolution
Objectives
Why did English politics degenerate to the point where
the King was at war with his own Parliament?
If he was a bad king, why did so many continue to
support him?
Why did the English republic fail to last?
What were the longer-term consequences of the English
Civil War and Interregnum.
Degeneration of English Politics
Serious religious divisions.
Breakdown of financial and political system in face of
inflation and rising costs of war.
The Problems of one King with multiple kingdoms.
Serious Religious Divisions.
Religious turmoil
1533-58.
By the end of the
century, Catholics and Puritans increase attacks on Elizabethan Church.
Catholics executed;
Puritans hounded out to Holland and America.
Catholics discredited
and decreasing in number under James I (1603-1625).
Puritans continue
anti-Catholic hysteria and extend it to moderate Protestants.
The Church under Charles I (1600-1649)
Increasing division
between Puritans and moderate Anglicans.
Charles married a French
Catholic, Henrietta Maria opposed by
Puritans.
Puritans alienate
Anglicans: Anglicans support the King,
against the attacks of Puritans.
Fear that religion would
again become a life-or-death issue.
The Church under Charles I (1600-1649)
Charles appoints
Archbishop of Canterbury; a moderate Anglican who favoured some Catholic
practices.
Puritans: Catholic Queen
and crypto-Catholic Archbishop evidence that Charles wanted to undermine the
English Church and re-establish Catholicism.
Breakdown of Financial and Political System
King expected to rely on
own financial resources during peace: rents, fees, customs.
Dramatic price
inflation: 1510-1597 585%.
Military changes make
war more expensive.
James I and Charles I
wanted to compete with other European monarchs militarily and culturally.
James I doubled
Elizabeths annual expenditure.
Royal income did not
keep pace with expenditure.
James I and Charles I
could barely afford peace time expenditure; wartime caused financial crisis.
Parliament and Taxation
English Parliament had
power to control taxation, unlike France and Spain.
Parliament granted
increases and could not understand why it was not enough.
Distrust between King
and Parliament.
Parliament believed
Charles was wasting money.
Collection of taxes
caused public hostility.
Charles hated Parliament
and ruled without it 1629-1639.
Charles had to resort to
unpopular sources of revenue: distrait of knighthood, ship money.
Political Crisis
MPs believe Charles was
subverting Parliament and establishing a dictatorship.
Charles thought
Parliament was trying to exceed its jurisdiction.
Parliament believed it
was defending the constitution against Charless attempts to subvert it.
Charles believed he was
defending the constitution against Parliaments attempts to subvert it.
The Problem of Multiple Kingdoms
James and Charles were
kings of Scotland and England, but they were administered separately.
Scotland had a different
religious settlement: more Calvinist and Presbyterian.
Scotland had a different
system of law and education.
James and Charles were
also kings of Ireland.
Irish religious
situation was complex: majority of Irish and original English nobility were
Catholic. Only later English emigrants were Anglican. There were also Scottish
Presbyterians.
The Problem of Multiple Kingdoms
English pretended their king was monarch of a single
state called England. They tried to force their kings to do things that as
kings of Scotland, they could not do.
Charles I of England, like Charles V HRE, could not be
one religion in one kingdom and another in another.
The First Great Crisis
1637 Charles I and Laud
tried to change Scottish Church to make it more like the English.
This caused a great
rebellion.
Charles sent a English
army to fight the Scots in 1639 but ran out of money and was defeated.
Charles called the Short
Parliament to get more money but MPs demanded that he address their grievances
first, but he refused.
In 1640, the Scots
invaded England and defeated the English Army again.
The Long Parliament
Charles needed money to
pay the Scottish army.
Parliament was
distrustful of him and opposed him.
Un-parliamentary
taxation was abolished; new law requiring triennial Parliaments and king could not
dissolve it without its consent.
Parliament tried to
wrest control of the Army away from Charles.
Charles failed to arrest
5 Parliamentary leaders.
Charles moved to Oxford
and England split into two camps.
England Divided
Charles had the support
of the majority of the nobility and their dependents.
People joined the King
because they believed that parliament was undermining the King and usurping his
powers.
No matter how bad a
ruler he was, opposing a king was contrary to the will of God.
Parliament had no
long-term plan.
Parliament had the
support of London, the commercial and financial interests, radical politicians
and some of the nobility.
England Divided
People fought for Parliament because they believed the
King was trying to establish a dictatorship.
Regionally, London and SE supported Parliament; N and W
supported Charles.
The key issue was religion: Puritans and Calvinists
supported Parliament; Catholics and moderate Anglicans the King.
First Civil War 1642
King was a poor military
leader.
Parliament used
financial and administrative advantages of London and the navy.
Charless support was in
the countryside, but people would not fight outside their own county.
Parliament created the
New Model Army, better trained, organized and commanded and made independent of
Parliamentary control.
The Scottish Army
supported Parliament.
Second Civil War 1647.
Parliament won but did not know what to do next.
Charles negotiated with Scots, Parliament and the Army
but agreed to nothing.
Parliament began to fear the New Model Army more
Puritan and radical.
Parliament refused to pay the army.
Charles escaped and allied with the Scots.
The Army Takes Control
The Army under Oliver
Cromwell defeated and captured Charles in 1648.
Determined to execute
him, the Army purged Parliament of all but most radical.
Charles tried and
executed in 1649.
New Constitutional Problem: How to govern without a King.
A military dictatorship
without stable leadership.
Several Parliamentary
experiments failed. The military dictatorship was worse than Charles I.
Cromwell was one of the
few that people trusted declared Lord Protector in 1651.
How to reconcile popular
consent with Gods Providence and how to elect a Parliament that would not
overthrow all that he stood for.
The regime could only
survive as Cromwell.
Stability could only be
achieved with a restoration of the monarchy.
1660: The Restoration of
Charles II (1630-1685)
General amnesty; liberty
of conscience.
Parliament made land
settlement and paid the arrears to the army.
Parliamentary system and
Church of England restored as before the war.
Powers obtained by Long
Parliament retained King cannot rule without Parliament.
Results of the Civil War, Interregnum and Restoration
King could not rule without
Parliament or visa versa.
The King and Parliament
had to devise a stable system of government finance.
English would not endure
economic, political or social costs of a standing army.
Religious settlement had
to be broad enough for diversity of Anglican faith with safeguards to prevent
Catholicisation.
England compared to Europe
England had the
revolution but both experienced wars that had important religious contexts.
Issues regarding raising
of revenue to meet costs of war common to both.
Privileged regions and
groups contribute more to Crown finances and feared loss of ancient rights and
liberties from advancing power of state.
Monarchs trying to
change the existing system. Not a revolutionary society and a conservative
regime, but a conservative society and a revolutionary regime.
Back to
History 240 Y03 Home