Back to Whose Property?

The British Colonist

Tuesday Morning, March 2, 1869.

Beacon Hill Park- The Municipality Sustained

The meeting called last evening by order of the Mayor was largely attended by ratepayers and others interested in the preservation of Beacon Hill Park as city property, and to protest against the invasion of Municipal rights by the Legislative Council. Town Clerk Leigh acted as Secretary. His Worship the mayor called the meeting to order about 8 o'clock and stated the object of the call. He said the Park had been considered city property since '58, but in 1867 the Council passed an Act giving the Municipality of Victoria control of the park. A bylaw was introduced this session to extend the city limits to include Mr. Young's property, and hence the opposition on the part of the Government members. Mr. Young's property had always been religiously excluded from the city limits, although property lying a mile and a half distant from the city centre was included. The city workmen were engaged in blasting rock at Beacon Hill to metal the streets; Mr. Trutch demanded their authority for doing so, and was referred to the Mayor, who told him that the City had the power to control the Park by the Act of 1867, and that if he (the Mayor) saw Mr. Trutch cutting a tree down hw would bring him before Mr. Pemberton. It was stated at the Legislative Council that the city was about leasing a part of the Park to Capt. Stamp to build a stable. This was a falsehood. Capt. Stamp applied for permission to do so, but no report was ever made upon the application by the committee to whom it was referred. Don't let the Park go out of your fingers gentlemen, (continued the Mayor), if you do, it will be sold away from you. The pretext that they wish to beautify and improve it is nonsense. Why have they not done it before? You must raise your manly voices and tell the Government they shall not trample upon the public rights. Will you back up the Council (cries of "yes," "yes.")

W.J. Macdonald, Esq., (former Mayor) introduced the following Resolutions, which he supported with a few remarks:

Resolved, That in the opinion of this meeting, the course pursued by the Legislative Council with regard to the bill to amend the Municipal Ordinance, 1867. In attempting to withdraw the control over Beacon Hill Park from the municipal Council is extremely detrimental to the interests of the citizens of Victoria and that such withdrawal would be a retrograde movement throwing the management of the property of the people into the hands of the Lands and Works Department, the Chief being in no way responsible to the people.

That the conduct of those members of the Legislative Council who voted in support of the Corporation in this matter is deserving of the thanks of this meeting and of the citizens of Victoria.

Mr. Macdonald said that he was in the legislative Council when the Act of 1867 was passed, and got the Park put under Municipal control. He saw the Park while under Government control neglected and abused, and that was the reason why he wished the city to have charge of it. Some gentlemen who now opposed the Corporation were then warmly in favour of it. If the Municipal Council had abused their trust, he would not be there to-night. He asked the people to put their trust in the Governor, who he believed, would give the overzealous officials a rebuke, and end the whole matter. (Applause.)

Mr. W. Hebbard seconded the Resolution- which was carried with only one or two discontent voices.

Mr. W. S. S. Green, rose to propose the second Resolution. He thought the matter called for the vigorous action of every citizen. Some years ago an attempt was made by Governor Kennedy to close the roads leading to Beacon Hill Park by placing barriers across them. Those barriers were removed. If the act were repeated they would not be allowed to remain; the Municipal Council would never permit it. Governor Kennedy sent for him (Mr. Green) to consult with him as to the course he should pursue when the barriers were removed by the people, and he advised his Excellency to "grin and bear it," for the Government had no power to put them up again, and when the barriers were removed one evening, his Excellency took no further notice of them. He asked the assemblage if it would be advisable for the city to allow the Land and Works Department to take possession of the Park? (No!) Whilst the city was out of its power he thought it ought to keep out of it. [Hear.] The rock that had been removed had not disfigured the Park and had been used in making a better road than the Lands and Works Department had ever made. Mr. Green here read the second resolution, which is as follows:

Resolved, That this meeting strongly urge on their City Representatives the desirability of strengthening the hands of the Mayor and Council and supporting them in their laudable efforts to maintain the rights and privileges of the citizens in preventing the suggested withdrawal by the Legislative Council of the control of the Corporation over Beacon Hill Park.

Mr. Richard Lewis [an ex- Councilor] seconded the resolution in a few well-timed remarks. He thought every citizen ought to stand up for his rights, and the possession of the Park was one of them. [Applause.] There were notices in the trees that emanated from the Lands and Works Department before the Park had been handed over to the city. They ought to have been removed long ago. He believed the title of the people to the Park was indisputable. The resolution was carried only three votes being raised in opposition.

Robert Bishop, Esq., introduced the third resolution. The action to the Government in hand over the Park was like giving a loaf to a hungry man with a hungry family and saying "don't let them eat it!" It was quite true the Corporation were blasting rock at the Park, but the Lands and Works were doing the same within a stone's throw of the Corporation workmen. He would say with Burns:

"O wad some power the gift glorious To see ourselves as others see us."

Would that same power would give the gift to the Lands and Works Department to see itself as others see it. He thought the Council ought to be supported by good men selected from the people. He regarded the whole thing as a brutem ful nen- thundering words. Mr. Bishop then put the following resolution:

Resolved, That a Committee of Seven Citizens be deputed by this meeting to attend His Excellency the Governor in conjunction with the Mayor and Council for the purpose of urging His Excellency to refuse his sanction to any clause in the proposed amended Corporation Ordinance that may be subversive of the rights of the Mayor and Corporation of Victoria over Beacon Hill Park.

J.E. McMillan, Esq., seconded the resolution. He perfectly concluded with what had been said, and he thought quite enough had been said with regard to that part of the matter.

Loud cries for Mr. Fell, but that gentleman declined to make his appearance.

The resolution was unanimously carried with a tremendous "aye."

The committee named by the meeting were: W.J. Macdonald, Robert Bishop, , W.S. S. Green, Capt. E. Stamp, T.L. Stahlschmidt, Robert Burnaby.

Mr. McMillian here came forward and stated that he wished to say a few words upon a subject that had no connection with Beacon Hill Park, but in which the Municipality and the ratepayers had a direct interest. ....

The meeting then adjourned with three hearty cheers for the Mayor and Council.