Criteria to
assess the GPAI instrument
Expected size: 500 words.
|
Level |
Interpret
GPAI scores |
Player
Recommendations |
|
1 - 4 |
General sense of the course content. GPAI scores not noted. Description of actions general and with some evidence that the player understands each component in reflection. |
Ideas to improve GPAI score show a general idea of each component and how to improve. |
|
4 - 6 |
Good concept of course focus shown. GPAI scores noted for each component. |
Some specific cues noted to improve game performance. A general sense of how to practice to realize improvements. |
|
6 - 8 |
Very good sense of how the course develops tactical
concepts to support skill execution. |
The player identifies effective elements of own play and offers specific recommendation to improve game performance. The player notes some specific skill cues and tactical pointers to develop his/her game against an opponent. |
|
8 - 10 |
Excellent sense of how tactical play and skill
execution are taught in the class with evidence of how to apply ideas to
own game play. |
Player offers a clear sense of how the GPAI scores reflects his or her game play with specific stroke and movement skill cues to support his/her analysis. Player suggestions appropriate practice situations, adapted from class, to help improve his/her game play. Based on points won and lost the player can identify how they could play to maximize his/her ability to challenge the opponent. |