Welcome to graduate work in the Chemistry Department, University of Victoria. This document is the Graduate Handbook for the department. It is intended as a guide to all aspects of being a graduate student, but is not intended to repeat information that is found elsewhere, and in particular the Calendar, the Faculty of Graduate Studies' website and the Graduate Supervision Policy (which includes rules for much more than just supervision) should be consulted for further information.
This handbook, as the webpage found here, is the updated and official version of this document. The Graduate Advisor insists you read every single word in it. For convenience, you may wish to make a .pdf version of it. A recent .pdf version will often be here.
If you find any errors or have suggestions for improvement, please let the graduate secretary or graduate advisor know, and we will be happy to make changes.
Enjoy your time here, and we hope this document makes it easier for you.
(Department office hours are Monday to Friday 8:30 -4:30)
Office | Phone | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Department Chair: | Neil Burford | Ell 303 | 721-7150 | nburford@uvic.ca | ||||
Graduate Advisor: | Irina Paci | Ell 309 | 472-4946 | chemgadv@uvic.ca | ||||
Graduate Secretary: | Lori Aasebo | Ell 301 | 721-7156 | chemgsec@uvic.ca | ||||
Department Secretary: | Sandra Carlson | Ell 302 | 721-7150 | dsecchem@uvic.ca | ||||
Secretary/Receptionist: | Penny Gordon | Ell 301 | 721-7152 | chem@uvic.ca | ||||
Administrative Officer: | Rosemary Pulez | Ell 304 | 721-7153 | chemao@uvic.ca | ||||
Safety Officer: | Frank van Veggel | Ell 234 | 721-7184 | fvv@uvic.ca | ||||
Graduate Student Dept Rep: | Tasha Jarisz | tjarisz@uvic.ca | ||||||
Graduate Student GSC Rep: | Sun Kly | skly@uvic.ca | ||||||
Graduate Student CUPE Rep: | currently vacant | XXX@uvic.ca |
[Under construction]
These dates are approximate dates for a typical year. More general information on times and deadlines for your progress through your degree are given here.
Next Graduate Student Research Day: | XXXX | |
Last date to be considered for UVic Fellowships. | XXXX |
Your supervisor will be guiding you through your time here as a graduate student, and should be a first point of contact for information and advice. You will also have a supervisory committee, which includes your supervisor and whose other members are willing to help you. It will be a second point of contact for guidance and problem resolution. There is also a group of dedicated specialists in the department to help you navigate through the various rules and regulations:
The graduate secretary knows all the academic and financial rules about your graduate program and can be consulted about them. (Don’t accept the advice of fellow students on your academic program and regulations – please verify with the graduate secretary or check the Calendar for the year you started your program.) A file that contains all your evaluations and other documents is maintained within the department by the graduate secretary, who also makes sure that the information held by the university is up to date. At the university level, there are two units that deal exclusively with graduate students. The Faculty of Graduate Studies (FGS) is the umbrella faculty for graduate students. It deals with all the academic aspects of the graduate program, for example approving new graduate courses, dealing with grade appeals or making official decisions about thesis oral exams. The Graduate Admissions and Records Office (GARO) provides much of the administrative support for the work of FGS. In particular, it handles all aspects of the admissions process, and maintains the official records of your degree. In general, graduate students do not have to deal directly with GARO because the Graduate Secretary passes on the required information to them.
The Graduate Advisor advises on academic matters and is a general problem solver for issues that cannot easily be easily solved by your supervisor or supervisory committee. The Graduate Advisor can be consulted on a confidential basis about any problems related to your graduate program, for example about conflicts with your supervisor. In general, problems are solved in increasing order of severity by your suprvisor, your supervisory committee, the Graduate Advisor, the Department Chair, Associate Deans in FGS, the Dean of Graduate Studies, and the Senate Committee on Appeals. However, non-academic matters can involve other agencies on campus, such as the Ombudsperson or the Equity and Human Rights office. Although the Department Chair signs off on many graduate student matters and handles grade appeals and cases of plagiarism and academic misconduct, the Graduate Advisor deals with most of the academic and personnel issues involving graduate students.
This is just a brief summary of the roles of the supervisor, supervisory committee, graduate secretary and graduate advisor. The Graduate Supervision Policy has a lot more detail on the roles and responsibilities of these people. You should read every word in it and be familiar with it.
The department has other people not specifically associated with graduate students who you will likely interact with. In terms of graduate students, the secretary/receptionist issues keys, handles the mail and photocopiers, and processes petty cash requests, the department secretary deals with Teaching Assistant (TA) pay and immigration issues, and the administrative officer allocates desk space. The safety officer, together with the university's office of Occupational Safety, Health and Environment, ensures that chemistry labs are run safely.
There are several graduate students who represent you on departmental committees or other organizations. The graduate student departmental representative attends monthly chemistry department meetings on your behalf, representing your views and informing you of decisions and issues discussed at those meetings. The graduate student GSC representative similarly repesents you on the graduate studies committee, which is a departmental committee that oversees graduate student admissions and programs. Your CUPE representative (CUPE 4163 is the union for TAs) will help you with issues and disputes involving your TA that you cannot resolve informally. You are also a member of the Graduate Student Society (GSS), which is a university-wide society advocating for and providing services for all graduate students.
Approved March 2015. [Note: The new name for the AAA is Graduate Award - Academic Achievement (GAAA)]
Tuition fees are due at the end of the first month of term. Fee information, including how to pay and where is found here and FGS has a useful web page about tuition and fees.
The University of Victoria provides bursaries and scholarships to graduate students. A bursary is an award based on financial need. Since chemistry students receive a stipend, the case for financial need is harder to make than for students in departments that do not offer a stipend. Scholarships are awarded based on merit, and come in several types.
University of Victoria Fellowships are offered to entering students with high GPA (minimum of 7.0; an A- average on the last two years of course work). If funds allow, they may also be offered to continuing students. Students are selected by the GSC and do not need to apply. The awards are offered for one year only. They increase the stipend above that of a regular student, and also reduce the number of required TA sections from two to one. Incoming students who wish to receive a UVic fellowship should have been accepted by the cutoff date in the spring term.
University of Victoria Graduate Awards are offered to students with a GPA of 6.5 or more, in the form of GAAA awards as described in the department policy above.
Presidents Research Awards are top up awards given to students who already have NSERC or CIHR Scholarships. Such students (and holders of UVic Fellowhips) are also eligible for Howard E Petch or David F strong Research Scholarships ($7500). The GSC will apply for these awards on your behalf.
Other major awards from UVic include the lieutenant-Governor's Silver Medal for the best MSc thesis and the Governor-General's Gold Medal for the best PhD dissertation.
These are awards that come from funds given to the University by individual donors. They are ususally in the range of some hundreds of dollars, but there are many of them and in addition to their monetary values, they boost your CV. These are categorized below according to who makes the decision and whether or not you have to apply.
Chemistry: These are adjudicated by the Chemistry Graduate Studies Committee, who makes the applications on behalf of students who meet the criteria. More details are given on the donor awards page.
Faculty of Science: These are adjudicated by the Faculty of Science Graduate Advisory Committee. In general there is some flexibility in the area and there can be years when there are no applicants who meet the exact criteria, so students who meet criteria only tenuously will still be considered for these awards. You do not need to apply, the GSC applies on behalf of students who meet the criteria. More details are given on the donor awards page
University of Victoria (no application): These are adjudicated by the FGS Graduate Awards Committee (GAC). The Chemistry GSC makes a recommendation to the GAC on behalf of the student. The list below gives most of those that Chemistry graduate students are eligible for and those in bold have been awarded to chemistry students in the recent past. There are also a some for indigenous students. Take a look at the donor awards page; if you see another one for which you are eligible, or think that the GSC might not be aware of your eligibility, you should contact the Graduate Advisor. They are ususally in the range of some hundreds of dollars, but there are many of them, and you should hunt through the list for any that might meet your situation. Donors often have rather narrow criteria, and you might be one of few students that meet these criteria.
University of Victoria (application required): These are miscellaneous awards that require an application from you, with various application dates as described on the webpage.
NSERC and CIHR - this section under construction.
Last modified October 4, 2016
This award will be given to current graduate students to visit their BSc alma mater for graduate student recruitment purposes (meetings with undergraduate students/seminar/etc). The department will provide funding in support of the student's visit as follows:
60% of travel (air/bus etc) costs to a maximum of:
and 100% of reasonable local expenses (hotel for 1 night if necessary, local transportation, meals).
Interested students should submit the following to the Graduate Secretary (chemgsec@uvic.ca):
Applications can be submitted at any time. The Chemistry Graduate Studies Committee (GSC) will select recipients based on qualifications and strategic value of the proposed University. The GSC will provide guidance and assistance to successful applicants on what sort of activities can/should be undertaken during the student's visit. The student shall provide a short summary to the GSC after their visit is complete.
If you’re going to a conference to present your work, there is partial funding available from several sources. This needs to be arranged well in advance.
You are expected to be familiar with the rules of the University, but especially the Graduate Supervision Policy, which includes rules for much more than just supervision. These are the formal rules, but there are some general expectations about the standard of your work and what it means to be a graduate student. The calendar has sections on:
In addition, the Chemistry Department has a statement of expectations:
Approved November 2016
Graduate degrees in Chemistry at UVic are thesis or dissertation based, which means that research is the most important component of your degree. The unstructured nature of a research-based degree contrasts the more programmatic nature of course-based degrees. In this context, a key component of a successful postgraduate degree in chemistry is to be efficient and productive. We define “timely completion” as the desirable outcome of completing MSc or PhD program requirements within 2 or 4 years respectively.
You will have other activities in your life including other academic commitments (coursework, candidacy), employment (teaching assistantships), and other extra-curricular/ personal activities. Timely degree completion requires your sustained focus on, and dedication to, your research; your other activities should not compromise your research effort.
Your thesis/dissertation describes the outputs of your research. It is the nature of research that success is hard to predict, and output is not usually a simple function of time applied. The application of a regularly-scheduled 40-hour week (i.e. a “job” approach) is therefore not typically a successful strategy. Success in undergraduate degree programs routinely requires studying, reading, writing, etc. during some evenings and weekends. Similarly, students in other post-graduate degree programs (e.g. medicine, law) put in long hours studying. In this context, your research activities should be considered as analogous (in terms of commitment) to studying – it’s the main effort in pursuit of a successful degree.
So, we encourage you to work hard: Assess your level of effort on the basis of what you have actually accomplished, not just on the time you have spent. Develop a sense of urgency in planning, executing, and completing tasks. Be motivated by, and invested in, your research. The effort you put into your research should be guided largely by your own dedication. Take intellectual ownership of your research. Take charge of your skill and knowledge development.
Postgraduate study is also the next step in your professional career. Your thesis/dissertation is a program requirement, but there are other outputs that will define your future success. In chemistry, research publications are authored jointly by the student and supervisor, reflecting time and intellectual input by both parties. The time you spend researching the literature, drafting the paper, creating figures, tables, and graphics, and editing develops valuable skills that will serve you throughout your career – no matter what direction that takes you. Giving presentations in meetings or at conferences (another common activity for graduate students) is another example of a transferable skill.
Approach your degree as a professional. Be reliable, punctual, organized. Make sure whatever you do is of high quality. Learn to manage your time effectively and efficiently. Develop a sense of how long any specific task will take you to execute and plan accordingly. Research can be an inherently unstructured process, so do what you can to make it structured. To stay focused and motivated, it often helps to have organized activities to force you to manage your time and to do something every day. Develop skills to plan not just for the short term, but for the intermediate and longer terms (weeks-months).
Individual supervisors will communicate any specific expectations (beyond the general ones presented here) to you in writing at the outset of your program.
The University promotes a safe, respectful and supportive learning, working, and living environment. University policies prohibit discrimination, harassment, and sexualized violence. We understand that such behaviours can undermine student success. The Equity and Human Rights office (EQHR) is a resource for all Uvic community members, including students. EQHR provides education, information, assistance and advice in aid of building and supporting an inclusive and respectful campus. When issues and concerns arise, EQHR assists those involved through the range of support and resolution options available under the Sexualized Violence Prevention and Response policy and Discrimination and Harassment policy. EQHR staff are available by appointment—contact information and resources can be found at uvic.ca/equity.
The Department of Chemistry expects everyone participating in university activities in the department to model respectful behaviour and abide by applicable university policies. For more information please contact chemeqhr@uvic.ca or see the departmental secretary in person at Elliott 302, who will help you or direct you to the appropriate person.
Students are responsible for adhering to the Academic Integrity Policy for graduate students. This covers such things as plagiarism, cheating on exams and fabricating data. Plagiarism is misrepresenting the ideas or words of others as your own, and is considered a serious offense. Please make sure you understand what exactly is meant by this, since the standard may be different from what you are used to. There is helpful information on this on the University website. Cases of plagiarism can be factors in withdrawing a student from their degree.
Your research is likely funded at least in part by one of Canada's federal funding agencies (NSERC, SSHRC or CIHR) and these agencies have a common policy on Responsible Conduct of Research. This covers the obvious things such as falsifying data, but also covers such things as keeping complete and accurate records of your experiments so that they can be verified by others. Your messy lab book may be illegal! The policy mainly covers the procedures to follow if the rules are broken, because the agencies require the funded institutions to have specific internal policies, in this case UVic's Policy on Scholarly Integrity.
You chose your supervisor as part of the application process. You supervisor is a mentor, who will guide you to successful completion of your degree. Most research groups in Chemistry have weekly research meetings in which you will present and discuss your research results with your supervisor and the other members of your research group. Some supervisors have separate regular meetings with their graduate studemt, and so you will be in regular contact with your supervisor. The Chemistry department has no rules on the frequency you meet your supervisor, but the Graduate Supervision Policy (5.9d) requires that your supervisor meet with you at least twice per term.
Your supervisor may ask you to write reports, drafts or research papers or other text. The supervisor is expected to give you timely feedback on papers, theses and other written material. For papers, theses or dissertations, the Graduate Supervision Policy (5.9f) specifies that this be normally with 20 business days.
You supervisory committee oversees all aspects of your graduate program. Having members who are close to your area can be helpful in getting help with your research, perhaps on issues a little outside your supervisors expertise. The committee will be involved in all formal decisions involved in your program, including any problems that arise. You have the right to call a supervisory committee meeting to discuss any conflicts or supervisory issues that arise. If this is to discuss a conflict with your supervisor, see the Graduate Advisor, who can initiate a supervisory committee meeting, or can help you through other means. The Graduate Supervision Policy has more to say about the role of the supervisory committee
Your supervisory committee needs to be established in the first term of your degree. Discuss the membership of your committee with your supervisor; you must be consulted in this decision.
MSc committees have at least two members.
When it is time for your final defence, your examining committee will be your supervisory committee plus your examiner. At least one of the examining committee must be from a department or institution outside chemistry. If you have a member on your supervisory committee from outside Chemistry, then it is possible for your examiner to be from the Chemistry Department.
PhD committees have at least three members.
Graduate students must register for Chem 509 in both terms of every Winter Session during their degree program.
Enrolment in Chem 509 requires that students attend Chemistry Department Seminars as described in the syllabus each academic year (see below), and attend both Graduate Student Research Days (GSRDs) in November and February, and give a departmental seminar, normally in Term 4 or 5 of the MSc program or Term 10 or 11 of the PhD program.
A "COM" grade is assigned for Chem 509 when you submit your “Request for Oral Exam” upon completion of your thesis, as long as you have attended the requisite number of seminars for that term, and have given your departmental seminar. If you are submitting mid-term, consult with the instructor for the nunber of seminar attendances needed.
Chemistry Department Seminars take place on Mondays and/or Thursdays, 11:30 am – 12:45 pm.
Bookmark the seminar schedule and check it regularly, in case of changes.
Graduate students must attend 9 seminars in each term that Chemistry Department Seminars are scheduled. You are welcome to attend more! If you do not attend the requisite number of seminars, you must complete some extra seminar-related assignment, to be determined by the Chem 509 instructor.
Before leaving each seminar, initial the Chem 509 attendance sheet next to your name. Note: by signing the sheet, you are officially stating that you have attended the entire seminar. This statement falls under the Academic Integrity regulations outlined in the UVic Graduate Calendar.
As part of your Chem 509 attendance each term, you may attend up to three seminars from outside the Chemistry Department Seminar series (e.g. CAMTEC, Biochemistry, Physics, ad hoc Chemistry seminars), with permission from both the 509 instructor and your supervisor. To obtain permission, send an email request to the 509 instructor with a cc to your supervisor, prior to the date of the extra-departmental seminar you wish to attend. (Permission will not be granted for ad hoc seminars in the Chemistry Department that occur on the same days as official Department seminars.) The email should include full details of the seminar, including a URL or email notification for the event. Requests to substitute seminars will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
For all seminars, you are expected to show respect for the speakers and for other attendees. Arrive on time - late arrivals are disruptive for the speaker and the audience.
Graduate students give their departmental seminars during two GSRDs. These one-day mini conferences happen during the November and February Reading Breaks. The exact format will vary depending on the number of students presenting, and will be communicated early each term. All graduate students are required to attend these events. The GSRDs include poster sessions; every graduate student must give one poster or oral presentation at a GSRD during each academic year.
The Chem 509 instructor will schedule all presentations for the two GSRDs, in consultation with supervisors. In July, student speakers will be told in which GSRD they are scheduled to present. In September, poster presenters will be told in which GSRD they are scheduled to present.
Co-op and internship opportunitives, where you work in an industry, are possible in a Chemistry program, at the discretion of your supervisor. Acceptance of these may (or may not) change your overall funding picture or the timeline for completion cof your degree, candidacy exams etc. Consult with your supervisor and the Graduate Advisor.
Each term, the student and supervisor will discuss the student's progress and the expectations for the coming term. The details for this are given below. The faculty of graduate students is soon to implement a system in which an annual report is forwarded to them.
Approved by Faculty May 1, 2018
The Faculty of Graduate Studies Graduate Supervision Policy outlines in general terms the guidance and feedback that supervisors should provide to graduate students. This Chemistry Department policy on formally reviewing and providing feedback to graduate students on their research progress is considered an implementation of the FGS policy.
Throughout the graduate degree, research progress evaluation will take two formal modes:
1. A formative assessment through an evaluation form completed by the supervisor at least once a term;
2. An annual meeting with the supervisory committee for the purpose of a formal review of student progress.
1. The evaluation form
It is the supervisor’s responsibility to ensure that evaluation forms are completed for all students at least once a term, for every term that a student is working under their supervision. The supervisor will also ensure that copies of each completed form will be distributed to the student, supervisor, the student’s supervisory committee members, and the graduate secretary. A copy of the completed form will be included in the student’s Department file.
The evaluation form has two parts:
Both parts of the form should be completed within the first four weeks of the term, and again as necessary if new versions of the form are issued during the term.
Expectations: This part of the form provides an outline of work and goals for the term. This should be developed jointly by the student and supervisor; signatures from both are required. Signatures by student and supervisor on expectations imply agreement as to what expectations are for the term. Various formats may be used, e.g., itemized list vs. narrative. If student and supervisor cannot agree on expectations then a supervisory committee meeting should be held, at which the supervisory committee members should attempt to resolve the differences.
Feedback:The supervisor’s feedback should address the expectations for the previous term, general progress towards the degree, as well as other issues which have arisen over the course of the term can also be addressed. Feedback can be positive or negative but should be constructive in nature. The supervisor should meet with the student to discuss the evaluation.
The student signature on the evaluation part of the form acknowledges receipt of evaluation form.
If the supervisor feels that the student’s overall performance raises serious doubts about the ability of the student to continue their degree program, then the “unsatisfactory progress” box should be marked. This will trigger a formal supervisory committee meeting at which the student is given an opportunity to present his/her research progress, and the reasons for the unsatisfactory rating are discussed. Milestones and expectations for the following period should be written in consultation with the committee, addressing directly the issues that were unsatisfactory in the previous evaluation period. A date, no sooner than 8 weeks and no later than one term from the supervisory committee meeting triggered by the unsatisfactory rating should be set for the next formal evaluation of student progress. Two consecutive “unsatisfactory" ratings would normally trigger a memo to the Graduate Advisor, detailing the issues surrounding the unsatisfactory performance. A pattern of unsatisfactory academic and/or research performance may also be deemed by the supervisory committee as sufficient to trigger a memo. The memo should also include a recommendation by the committee of whether or not the Graduate Advisor should make an application to the Dean of Graduate Studies to withdraw the student for ‘failure to meet academic standards.’
2. The annual meeting of the supervisory committee.
Once every year, typically during the month following the anniversary of the student's registration in graduate studies, but normally within 14 months from registration or the previous meeting, a supervisory committee meeting will be arranged by the graduate secretary. A standard agenda outlining the items below will also be included in the meeting invitation. The meeting should follow the format described in Section 5.11 of the Graduate Supervision Policy, and should include:
(a) an opportunity for the student to present their progress towards completion of their degree;
(b) an opportunity for the committee to discuss student progress with the student, and any associated concerns;
(c) an opportunity for the committee to discuss student progress in the absence of the student.
(d) for an MSc student, the first yearly meeting will also normally include a determination of whether the student will transfer to the PhD degree or will complete an MSc degree.
A student evaluation form will be created in agreement with the committee at each annual meeting, including expectations and milestones for the next term and feedback on student progress. An additional evaluation by the supervisor is not necessary for that term.
Students who start out in an MSc degree and show sufficient promise for a PhD program may be able to transfer to a PhD degree. This is determined by their supervisory committee, normally at the first yearly meeting (see evaluation policy above). In such a case, the coursework and research work already completed counts towards the PhD degree, and the student proceeds as though the start date of their PhD was their original MSc start date.
The candidacy exam is to determine if you have the requisite intellectual and research skills to succeed in getting a PhD. As part of this, you write a research proposal for your PhD research, in which you establish that you have mastered the relevant literature, can place your work in the context of the field, and can defend its originality and viability. At the oral exam part, you will defend the proposal, and also answer questions that probe your expertise in relevant areas of knowledge that a PhD in your area would be expected to have. The Calendar gives the official rules in Chemistry for the candidacy exam, including the format for the report. In particular, notice that two attempts are permitted, and that students who fail may be able to complete an MSc degree.
This section gives additional information/advice for the student and committee members.
The point of a proposal is to explain what you want to do, why you want to do it, and how it is important in the field. A well-written proposal - and a successful candidacy report - should make it clear to other readers that the work is (i) worth doing and (ii) has a reasonable chance of success.
A proposal needs to provide a context for the work (background/literature survey), a (brief) presentation of recent progress and a plan for near-term work. A rough guideline for how to partition the proposal into these three major sections:
Introduction/background/literature | ~ 25% |
Recent progress | ~ 25% |
Proposed work | ~ 50% |
The main point here is that the proposal needs to constitute the majority of the prose. If proposed work is substantially less than half of the report, it will read less like a proposal and more like a review or report. The end of the introduction section should articulate clearly the long term objectives of the proposed work.
Here is a list of questions that your proposal should address (but don’t actually put these as section headings in the proposal):
The exam can start when everyone is present. The student should arrive 10 minutes early to ensure the computer and projector (if required) are ready.
The exam chair begins by briefly explaining the exam process which is as follows:
(1) The student will give a 15 minute (maximum) presentation based on their written proposal.
(2) The committee will examine the student on both their written proposal/presentation and on the general topics which were given to the student (and the committee) four weeks prior to the exam. Two rounds of questions are permitted; normally the first round is longest - committee members can take up to 20 minutes each. The second round is normally somewhat shorter in duration; the total length of the exam is usually approximately 2 hours although this does not have to be enforced rigorously. Room bookings for the exam will be for 2.5 hours.
(3) Once the two rounds are complete, the student will be excused from the exam room but asked to remain close by (but out of earshot of discussion in the exam room). The chair will solicit the assessment of each committee member as to the quality of the report and the performance in the exam. Once a decision has been reached, the student is invited back into the room and the committee’s decision is communicated to the student by the chair. A follow up email to the student is also sent with any specific instructions (see below).
The assessment of the student’s performance should be based on (1) the quality of their written proposal and (2) their performance in the exam. If both are acceptable then the student has passed the exam.
If the exam performance is acceptable but there are deficiencies with the report that the committee feels should be addressed, the committee can require a resubmission of the report to the committee. As a general guideline, the level of deficiencies that would require a resubmission should be broadly analogous to the “major revisions” category for thesis submission; changes that would fall under “minor revisions” do not normally require a revised report to be submitted. The chair will solicit suggestions from the supervisory committee and send the student a memo outlining the deficiencies and provide guidance on how to fix them. The memo will include a deadline for resubmission of the proposal, normally within 4-6 weeks of the exam. The student should submit the revised report directly to all committee members and the exam chair. The department graduate secretary will schedule a half-hour meeting of the supervisory committee to take place 7-10 days after the revision deadline, at which the committee members will decide whether or not the revised proposal is acceptable. A passing grade will be administered once the committee members have all indicated to the exam chair that the revised proposal is acceptable. A revised report which substantially addresses the significant deficiencies but still has some outstanding “minor revisions” – level corrections is considered acceptable. A revised report which is deemed unacceptable constitutes a failed candidacy.
If the performance in the exam is not of acceptable quality, a repeat exam will be scheduled within one semester of the date of the first exam. With input from the supervisory committee, the exam chair will provide a memo to the student outlining (i) the reasons for the assessment and (ii) the format for the new exam (e.g. whether a new presentation is required) and the material that the student will be responsible for in the repeat exam. Unsatisfactory performance in the second exam constitutes failure of the candidacy.
The exam chair is not a member of the supervisory committee but is permitted to clarify questions or answers as they deem appropriate. Chairs should ensure that questioning is at an appropriate level and tone, and that there is broad consistency in the level of all examinations. All of the exam chairs are to meet once per term to discuss this issue.
In the event that the committee cannot come to consensus as to whether the student has passed/failed the exam, they will put it to a vote (the supervisor does NOT have a veto for or against). In the event of a 2-2 tie, the student’s supervisor’s vote is given lower weight than that of the other committee members (i.e. if supervisor +1 other committee member vote to pass and 2 others vote to fail, the result is fail; if supervisor + 1 vote against and 2 others vote to pass, the result is pass). The chair does not vote on the outcome of the exam.
The exam chair is responsible for reporting the outcome of the exam by email to the Department Chair for approval. The email should include the students name, ID number (this can be obtained from the Graduate Secretary) and the outcome of the exam. The Department Chair approves the outcome by forwarding the email to the department Graduate Secretary noting “approved” in the email. The Graduate Secretary then sends the approved email to the Graduate Admissions and Record Office (GARO) clerk, with copies to the student, the Graduate Advisor, and all members of the supervisory committee. The general form of the email should look like:
John Doe (V00123456) passed his candidacy exam on (date). His candidacy report was titled “XXXXXXXXXXX”
John was questioned on his written report as well as the following general topics:
1) AAA 2) BBB 3) CCC
Note that the only information conveyed is whether the student passed or failed – GARO doesn’t need to know anything else.
The following guide to the timeline for a degree summarizes the normal timeline for a student starting in September. In most cases the term and month numbers also apply for students starting in other terms. Not all the dates are fixed - for more information see the policies in this handbook and in the Calandar, which are the official versions that supercede those here if there is a discrepancy.
Year | Term | Month | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 (Sep-Dec) | Establish supervisory committee | |
2 (Jan-Apr) | First poster presentation at GSRD (one per year required) | ||
3 (May-Aug) | |||
2 | 4 (Sep-Dec) | 13-14 (Sep-Oct) | Supervisory committee meeting with annual evaluation. MSc: Determination of transfer to PhD. |
15 (Nov) | MSc: Give Chem 509 talk at GSRD (Nov or Feb) | ||
5 (Jan-Apr) | 18 (Feb) | ||
PhD: Recommended term for candidacy exam (direct or transferred students) | |||
6 (May-Aug) | MSc: Last term of guaranteed funding - target for thesis oral and submission PhD (direct entry): Last term for completing candidacy |
||
3 | 7 (Sep-Dec) | 25-26 (Sep-Oct) | Supervisory committee meeting with annual evaluation. |
8 (Jan-Apr) | 29-30 (Jan-Feb) | PhD (transferred from MSc): Complete candidacy within 16 months of transfer | |
9 (May-Aug) | |||
4 | 10 (Sep-Dec) | 37-38 (Sep-Oct) | Supervisory committee meeting with annual evaluation. |
39 (Nov) | PhD: Give Chem 509 talk at GSRD (Nov or Feb) | ||
11 (Jan-Apr) | 42 (Feb) | ||
12 (May-Aug) | PhD: Last term of guaranteed funding - target for dissertation oral and submission | ||
5,6,7 | each Sep or Oct | Supervisory committee meeting with annual evaluation | |
5 | 60 (Aug) | MSc: 5-year FGS maximum time for degree completion | |
7 | 84 (Aug) | PhD: 7-year FGS maximum time for degree completion |
At UVic, the official term for your MSc thesis is thesis, but your PhD "thesis" is officially called a dissertation. For writing your thesis, writing groups, checklists, formatting guides, and samples see the Faculty of Graduate Studies thesis and dissertation page. There is also a Centre for Academic Communication that offers workshops and personalized help with writing.
In terms of formatting, see the Thesis format checklist and sample pages. There are templates for Word and LaTeX. The department does not have any additional requirements beyond those of the Faculty of Graduate Studies.
Be careful with copyright issues. If you are going to use a literature figure, you will need permission from the copyright holder, usually the publisher. Some publishers have easy online applications that give you permission automatically, but for others there may be significant lead time. Even if you have permission, you will need to state the source in the figure caption, with something like "reproduced with permission". Some publisheres have very specific wording they want if you use their figures. In many cases, such as an energy level diagram that is fairly generic, it is easiest to redraw the figure yourself, making it look significantly different from the original. Even in this case, if the figure source is unique, you should state "adapted from ....".
Sometimes you may want a chapter of your thesis to be one of your papers that is already published. Consult the publisher to see if this is allowed; generally speaking it is. Again, there may be specific wording that the publisher requires. If you are putting in a chapter that is a paper to be submitted, you need to be more careful. Some publishers may consider your thesis to be "prior publication", meaning that you cannot publish the work with that publisher, and will have to find a different publisher for that chapter.
Generally speaking, you need to finish writing early in a term, in order to defend that term. Note that if you are planning to defend in the summer term, you may have difficulty getting your committee together for an August defense. In this case, if you defend by the 15th of September, and complete changes before the end of September, you may not have to pay fees for the whole of the fall term - see the Completion Postponement Fee Adjustment on the "Tuition Fees and Payments" section of the tuition webpage.
Work backwards, looking at your particular term to get the exact deadlines you need to meet:
The guidelines for the exam and possible outcomes are here.
The examination normally lasts from 1 ½ - 2 hours. It is an open exam and you may invite your friends and family. At least some of your fellow graduate students are likely to be there.
The most common outcome is minor revisions. The word minor here refers to the seriousness of the revisions, and not the number. There may be very many revisions, but they are not considered serious enough to require further attention from the committee. Rather the supervisor is delegated to make sure that you make the changes, and will not sign off until you have made them.
After your successful defense, you will likely need to make some changes as dictated by your examining committee. After you have done that, you will need to make a .pdf copy of your thesis in the right format and then it is ready for final submission according the to the FGS checklist. Your thesis will be uploaded to UVicSpace, which is a website where anyone has access to your thesis; there is further information about the submission process here.
The Chemistry Department will arrange for binding of a hardcopy book of your thesis or dissertation, with a copy for you, for the department, and for your supervisor.
The university has a range of people and services to help you manage your life and health while you are a graduate student, and you can find most of them through the UVic website. Some of these are
In this section the focus is on getting help with progressing through the steps of your graduate program, both coursework and research.
The university operates on the principles of natural justice, which means that you have the opportunity to have your side of the story heard and to be fairly treated, and progressive discipline, which means that most matters are dealt with at first informally, and then if a problem persists, more formally and with greater penalties at increasingly higher levels within the university. You have the opportunity to appeal a decision at one level to a higher level. For most issues related to graduate studies, you supervisor will be the first point of contact in solving problems. If not resolved, then you move up the chain of authority: your supervisory committee (you have the right to call a supervisory meeting), the Graduate Advisor, Department Chair, Associate Dean of Graduate Studies, Dean of Graduate Studies, Senate Committee on Appeals.
If your supervisor is unable to assist you in problem solving, or if you have a problem with your supervisor, the Graduate Advisor can be consulted on a confidential basis. The Associate Deans of Gradute Studies are also available for confidential consultation on any aspect of your graduate program.
The faculty of graduate studies has a web page that lists all the Graduate Studies policies.
The Omsbudsperson is a resource person on campus who helps you interpret university procedures, find the right procedure to solve your problem, or put you in touch with the right person on campus to help you.
It is sometimes said that a "B-" (70-72%) is a failing grade for a graduate course, but this is a relatively common occurrence that simply calls for some remedial action. Every grade of B- or less has to be reviewed by your supervisory committee and a recommendation made to the Dean of Graduate studies. Sometimes, if you are only are slightly below, your other coursework and research is going well and there are extenuating circumstances, there may be no action taken other than require a certain GPA bar for upcoming work. More commonly, you will be required to take the course again, or take another course in your next term and meet a certain grade threshold. If your grade is C+ or below and there do not seem to be any extenuating circumstances, there is a possibility that you will be required to withdraw. The detailed rules are in the Graduate Supervision Policy Sec. 7.15.
The more common scenario requiring withdrawal is if you get a second grade of B- or below. Here again, your supervisory committee must meet and make a recommendation for appropriate action, which may be a recommendation for withdrawal, i.e, you would fail your degree and your transcipt would be annotated with "academic failure". If a recommendation for withdrawal is made by your supervisory committee, it will be considered by the Graduate Advisor, Graduate Studies Committee and the Chair of the Department, who will seek further input from you. If they reccommend withdrawal to the Dean and the Dean accepts this recommendation, you will have an opportunity of appealing the Dean's decision to the Senate Committee on Appeals. It is likely that before the Dean makes a formal decision, you will be asked to meet with an Associate Dean and present your side of the story. In any case, you may request a meeting with the Dean (Graduate Supervision Policy Sec. 9.2)
The Graduate Supervision Policy Sec. 6.15 lists other factors that (singly or in combination) can lead to you being withdrawn from your degree - aside from low grades in coursework, these include things such as unsatisfactory research progress, academic misconduct (e.g., plagiarism), safety violations, and repeated failure to complete tasks or attend meetings. These violations all need to be documented (typically in your term evaluations). Once the decision is made for withdrawal, it takes place at the end of the academic term in which the decision is made.
Occasionally interpersonal conflicts with your supervisor will escalate to the point that the the relationship is dysfunctional. Well before this point, you should seek the confidential advice of the Graduate Advisor, who will try to solve these issues informally, or through meetings of the supervisory committee.
The supervisory relationship can be severed in two ways. You may decide to withdraw from the supervisory relationship (Graduate Supervision Policy Sec. 11.4), in which case you will need to find a new supervisor. Alternatively, the supervisor may withdraw (Graduate Supervision Policy Sec. 11.2), in which case the department is responsible for continuity of supervision and for locating a new supervisor. In either case, this is a serious issue that has implications for your ongoing funding and other issues, such as whether or not your research to date can be included in your thesis. Read the Graduate Supervision Policy and consult the Graduate Advisor.